“Trust, Distrust, and Power” in Distrust – ed. Russell Hardin

The so-called “encapsulated interest” account of trust, developed by Russell Hardin together with other interested scholars, draws together an important body of thought about trust and its meaning in social and personal relations.1 Trust, under this account, involves considered expectations about the interests of others to behave in a trustworthy manner. Some scholars argue that trust of this sort is not trust at all. Laurence Becker (Becker 1996), for example, argues that “cognitive” trust, of the sort discussed in the encapsulated interest account, is indistinguishable in the final analysis from knowledge and power. Becker over-simplifies considerably; it is clear both that many instances of power over another, or knowledge of another’s interests, do not create trust, and that even when power may engender trust, the concepts remain distinguishable. For example, as Hardin argues (Hardin forthcoming), trust does not apply in a relationship where I am holding a gun to your head; while I certainly have power over you, and know that you have an overwhelming interest to do what I tell you to do, the degree of certainty that I have about your interests renders trust irrelevant. While power, and knowledge of the effects of power on interests, may clearly affect trust under certain circumstances, the concepts should not be conflated.

Henry Farrell, “Trust, Distrust, and Power” in Distrust, ed. Russell Hardin (Russell Sage Foundation, 2004).

Access the full text here.

Other Writing:

Essay

America Should Think Twice Before Replacing Sanctions with Tariffs – with Abraham Newman

Donald Trump complains that they are undermining the supremacy of the dollar. Access the full article here. Henry Farrell (and Abraham Newman), “America Should Think Twice Before Replacing Sanctions with Tariffs,” Financial Times, September 19, 2024.
Read Article
Academic Article

Ontology, Methodology and Causation in the American School of International Political Economy – with Martha Finnemore

This paper explores disjunctures between ontology and methodology in the American school to better understand both the limits of this approach and ways we can counter its blind spots. Tierney and Maliniak’s TRIP data point to a strong elective affinity between, on the one hand, rationalist/liberal 10 ontological assumptions and quantitative methodologies, and on the other, constructivist ...
Read Article