Bias, Skew and Search Engines Suffice to Explain Online Toxicity – with Cosma Shalizi

Henry Farrell and Cosma Shalizi (2024), “Bias, Skew and Search Engines Suffice to Explain Online Toxicity,” Communications of the ACM, preprint, 67,4:25-28.

U.S. political discourse seems to have fissioned into discrete bubbles, each reflecting its own
distorted image of the world. Many blame machine-learning algorithms that purportedly maximize
“engagement” — serving up content that keeps YouTube or Facebook users watching videos or
scrolling through their feeds — for radicalizing users or strengthening their partisanship. Sociologist
Shoshana Zuboff [15] even argues that “surveillance capitalism” uses optimized algorithmic feedback
for “automated behavioral modification” at scale, writing the “music” that users then “dance” to.

There is debate over whether such algorithms in fact maximize engagement (their objective
functions also typically contain other desiderata). More recent research [3] offers an alternative
explanation, suggesting that people consume this content because they want it, independent of
the algorithm. It is impossible to tell which is right, because we cannot readily distinguish the
consequences of machine learning from users’ pre-existing proclivities. How much demand comes
from algorithms that maximize on engagement or some other commercially valuable objective
function, and how much would persist if people got information some other way?

Even if we can’t answer this question in any definitive way, we need to do the best we can. There
are many possible interface technologies that can help organize vast distributed repositories of
knowledge and culture like the Web.

Read the full text in this preprint.

Other Writing:

Academic Article

Introduction: Blogs, Politics and Power – with Daniel W. Drezner

There is good reason to believe that blogs are changing politics, but we don’t know exactly how. Nor do we know whether the normative consequences of blogs for poli- tics are likely to be good or bad. In this special issue, we and our co-authors undertake the first sustained effort to map the empirical and ...
Read Article
Essay

Blogs and Bullets II: New Media and Conflict after the Arab Spring with Sean Aday, Marc Lynch, John Sides and Deen Freelon

Based on Twitter and Facebook data gathered during the 2011 Arab revolutions, the authors of this Peaceworks report find that new media informed international audiences and mainstream media reporting, but they find less evidence that it played a direct role in organizing protests or allowing local audiences to share self-generated news directly with one another. ...
Read Article